About a month ago a study came out of Stanford University
which proclaimed organic foods are not more nutritious than conventional
foods. This article has been a source of
quite a bit of controversy because of its conclusions, which are at odds with
numerous other studies that have come out over the years. It is also curious that they point out
several factors such as the obvious fact that organic produce will not have synthetic
pesticides on them, at times say how good organics are and then turn around and
claim that essentially there is no difference.
The New York Times recently published a piece sounding off on this
study. This is a link to a discussion about
the piece that I found very interesting.
http://www.naturalnews.com/037625_Stanford_organics_junk_science.html
No comments:
Post a Comment